K–12 Market Intelligence Query
Ask about curriculum adoptions, district demographics, HQIM usage, and procurement signals.
manage_search
Top 3 MS Math curriculum nationwide
Midwest districts with high ML populations using HQIM Math
Districts that adopted Illustrative Mathematics in 2022–23
Districts purchasing external strategic planning support
High-poverty districts in Southeast that recently adopted new ELA
Include:
Subject Math · ELA · Science
Grade K–2 · 3–5 · 6–8 · 9–12
Type Core · Supplemental · Assessment
Location State · Region · NCES ID
search
Active Adoption State
Science of Reading Mandate Active
lightbulb
CA's ELA IMA cycle concludes 2025 — 73% of matching districts are expected to make final adoption decisions within 18 months.
domain District Identity
Los Angeles USD
Los Angeles County, California
NCES ID: 0622710
LEA TypeRegular Public
LocaleUrban (11)
Enrollment562,000
Schools1,022
Peer Comparison
Ranks #3 largest among similar urban CA districts. FRL rate is 18 pts above peer median.
bar_chart Demographics
80.1%
Free/Reduced Lunch
33.2%
English Learners
11.4%
Students w/ IEPs
3.8%
Homeless
Hispanic / Latino73.4%
Black / African American8.8%
White8.5%
Asian6.1%
target Switch Likelihood
K–5 Math
Core · Next 18 months
74%
↑ Rising
6–8 Math
Core · Next 18 months
48%
→ Stable
K–5 ELA
Core · Next 18 months
81%
↑ Rising
6–8 ELA
Core · Next 18 months
22%
↓ Low signal
Top Signal
District currently uses 3 different Math series across grade bands — multiple curriculum series is the highest-weighted factor in the predictive model.
menu_book Current Core Curriculum
| Subject | Grade | Product | Year Adopted | EdReports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Math | K–5 | Eureka Math HQIM | 2021 | Green |
| Math | 6–8 | Illustrative Math HQIM | 2022 | Green |
| ELA | K–5 | Into Reading | 2020 | Yellow |
| ELA | 6–8 | StudySync HQIM | 2021 | Green |
| Science | K–8 | Amplify Science | 2023 | Green |
event District Adoption Schedule
In use
Review / Pilot
Adoption window
Projected replacement
2022
2023
2024
2025 ◆
2026
2027
2028
2029
Upcoming Milestones
contacts Key Decision Makers
Source: District site · BoardDocs · LinkedIn
folder_open Available Assets
description
Strategic Plan 2022–2027
Sep 2022
description
Strategic Plan 2018–2022
Aug 2018
gavel
Board Meeting — Math Adoption
Mar 2024
payments
FOIA: PO Records 2022–24
Ongoing
Adoption State: CA is in an active ELA adoption cycle. Districts are expected to finalize materials selections by fall 2025.
Districts
Students
HQIM Math Rate
HQIM ELA Rate
calculate Math — Top 5
chrome_reader_mode ELA — Top 5
policy Policy Landscape
timeline State Adoption Timeline
Hover any year to see the materials on the state-approved list · Click to drill down
Math adoption
ELA adoption
Science adoption
Policy milestone
Eureka Math
Great Minds · Math · Core Curriculum · K–12 · Multiple editions (2015, 2020, 2022)
18.4%
% Students with Access
~9.2M of 50M K–12 students nationally
1,847
Districts Using
Active adoptions across 47 states
Green
EdReports Overall
Meets expectations — all grade bands
+6.2%
YoY Adoption Growth
Compared to SY 2022–23
Student Access Breakdown
Elementary (K–5)22.8%
Middle School (6–8)17.1%
High School (9–12)12.4%
61%
Urban access
24%
Suburban
15%
Rural
Adoption Prevalence Over Time
% of districts nationally
From 6.3% in 2017 to 18.4% today — steady growth driven by state-approved adoption cycles in CA, LA, and TN.
Largest Districts Using This Curriculum
Ranked by enrollment · Showing top 8 of 1,847
| District | State | Enrollment | Grade Bands | Year Adopted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York City DOE | NY | 915,000 | K–5 | 2019 | Active |
| Los Angeles USD | CA | 562,000 | K–5 | 2021 | Active |
| Chicago Public Schools | IL | 330,000 | K–8 | 2020 | Active |
| Houston ISD | TX | 195,000 | 6–8 | 2022 | Pilot |
| Dade County Schools | FL | 334,000 | K–5 | 2018 | Active |
| Clark County SD | NV | 305,000 | K–8 | 2020 | Active |
| Philadelphia SD | PA | 118,000 | K–5 | 2019 | Active |
| Hillsborough County | FL | 223,000 | K–5 | 2021 | Active |
EdReports Ratings by Grade Band
Three gateway review · Higher = stronger evidence of meeting expectations
| Grade | Gateway 1 — Focus & Coherence | Gateway 2 — Rigor & Practices | Gateway 3 — Usability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | Meets (14/14) | Meets (18/18) | Meets (38/38) | Green |
| 1 | Meets (14/14) | Meets (18/18) | Meets (38/38) | Green |
| 2 | Meets (14/14) | Meets (18/18) | Meets (37/38) | Green |
| 3–5 | Meets (14/14) | Meets (18/18) | Meets (38/38) | Green |
| 6–8 | Meets (14/14) | Meets (16/18) | Meets (36/38) | Green |
| Algebra 1 | Meets (14/14) | Partial (13/18) | Meets (34/38) | Yellow |
Reviewer summary: Strong focus and coherence across K–8; procedural fluency and application consistently rated high. Algebra 1 module falls short on application-of-mathematics strand — a newer 2022 refresh is under re-review.
verified Present on Adopted Materials Lists
States where this curriculum currently appears on the state adoption list, state HQIM list, or state-approved list. Click a state to view its full adoption timeline.
school Professional Learning Partners
Vetted PL providers supporting implementation of this curriculum
Partners are ranked by coverage (grade bands served), verified implementation track record, and alignment to publisher-approved scope & sequence.